| Melnick GA, Fonkych K. Inquiry. 2016;53:0046958016651555.Peer reviewed · DOI 10.1177/0046958016651555 | 2004-2013 | Commercial inpatient allowed payments from Blue Shield of California; about 230 hospitals in 2012California statewide hospital sample · Case-mix-adjusted allowed payment per inpatient admission | Longitudinal hospital analysis with regression adjustment | Prices per admission increased 76% across all hospitals. Adjusted prices increased 113% at hospitals in the two largest systems versus 70% at other hospitals; by 2012-2013 the large-system differential was $3,964 (25%). | One commercial payer, nominal prices, historical period, and observational design; the study does not establish that system membership alone caused the differential. |
|---|
| Zhuang T, Shapiro LM, Baker LC, Kamal RN. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023;481(6):1061-1068.Peer reviewed · DOI 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002489 | March 2021 price files and 2021 CMS quality measures | Public insurer-negotiated facility prices for total joint arthroplasty; 22 hospitals, 18 with complete quality dataOne large California health system · Payer-specific negotiated facility price for DRG 470 | Cross-sectional descriptive and correlation analysis | Across 18 hospitals, the overall mean negotiated price was $54,500 (SD $23,200); payer-type means ranged from about $20,300 for Medicaid to $78,800 for commercial out-of-network coverage. No tested price-quality correlation met the study's corrected significance threshold. | Single system, one procedure, posted prices rather than claims-paid amounts, incomplete quality data, and cross-sectional associations. |
|---|
| Brodke DJ, Guo C, Aouad M, Brown TT, Bozic KJ. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(24):2212-2218.Peer reviewed · DOI 10.2106/JBJS.19.00475 | 2009-2013; reference pricing began January 2011 | 2,023 CalPERS and 8,024 non-CalPERS total joint arthroplasty patientsCalifornia CalPERS and same-carrier comparison population · Insurer and patient payments for hospital total joint arthroplasty | Difference-in-differences observational evaluation | Reference pricing was associated with a 19-percentage-point increase in lower-priced hospital selection and a $5,067 reduction in mean insurer payment, while mean patient out-of-pocket payment increased $1,991; most measured quality indicators did not change significantly. | Employer PPO population, elective joint replacement, observational parallel-trends design, and policy effects are not a statewide hospital price level. |
|---|
| Robinson JC, Brown TT, Whaley C, Finlayson E. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(11):1783-1789.Peer reviewed · DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4588 | 2009-2013; reference payment began January 2012 | 35,195 CalPERS colonoscopy episodes before/after and 258,616 Anthem comparison episodesCalifornia CalPERS and Anthem comparison population · Allowed price for colonoscopy across hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory surgery centers | Difference-in-differences observational evaluation | Reference payment increased use of low-priced facilities by 17.6 percentage points and reduced adjusted price by 21.0%; CalPERS reported $7.0 million (28%) lower spending over two years, with no statistically significant complication change. | Includes hospital and nonhospital sites, one purchaser and carrier, outpatient procedure only, and observational policy evaluation. |
|---|
| Farrell KS, Finocchio LJ, Trivedi AN, Mehrotra A. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(2):110-114.Peer reviewed · DOI 10.1007/s11606-009-1176-5 | Post-AB 1045 field experiment published 2010 | Written estimate requests for hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, or screening colonoscopy from a hypothetical uninsured patient353 California acute-care hospitals · Hospital-provided self-pay price estimate | Audit study | Only 28% of hospitals responded. Estimates varied from $3,500-$65,300 for hysterectomy, $2,700-$36,000 for cholecystectomy, and $350-$5,805 for colonoscopy; 75% of estimates exceeded the median California Medicare reimbursement. | Estimates were often non-comparable, sometimes excluded physician fees, and do not represent negotiated insurer prices or actual paid claims. |
|---|